Questions: Even if a statute's words have ordinary, everyday significance, the court will look at the legislative history of the law and public policy in order to interpret the statute.

The answer is True.

When interpreting statutes, courts often consider more than just the plain language of the law. Here’s why:

Courts frequently look at the legislative history and public policy to understand the intent behind a statute. This approach helps ensure that the law is applied in a way that aligns with the lawmakers' original objectives and the broader societal context. Legislative history can include records of debates, committee reports, and other documents that shed light on what the legislature intended when they passed the law. Public policy considerations help ensure that the interpretation of the statute aligns with the current needs and values of society.

This option would suggest that courts rely solely on the plain language of the statute without considering any external factors. While the plain language is often the starting point, it is not the only factor courts consider. Ignoring legislative history and public policy could lead to interpretations that are technically correct but practically or ethically problematic.

Therefore, the statement is true because courts do consider legislative history and public policy in their interpretations.