One value instilled during my primary socialization was the belief that men should be the primary breadwinners in a family. The agents of socialization for this gender norm included my parents, teachers, and media representations.
I have conformed to this gender norm to some extent, as I pursued a career with the intention of being financially stable and supporting my family. However, I also believe in and support the idea that both partners in a relationship can contribute equally to the household, both financially and in terms of domestic responsibilities.
I conformed to this norm because it was deeply ingrained in me from a young age through various socialization agents. The societal expectation and the reinforcement of this belief by those around me made it seem like the natural course of action. However, my exposure to diverse perspectives and evolving societal norms has led me to challenge and partially rebel against this traditional belief.
A conflict theorist would view gender socialization as a mechanism that perpetuates inequality and maintains the status quo. According to conflict theory, societal structures are set up in a way that benefits certain groups at the expense of others. In the context of gender socialization, this means that traditional gender roles are taught and reinforced to maintain male dominance and female subordination.
Conflict theorists argue that these norms are not natural or inevitable but are constructed to serve the interests of those in power. For example, by socializing men to be breadwinners and women to be caretakers, society ensures that men hold more economic power and women remain dependent. This division of labor benefits the capitalist system by providing unpaid labor (domestic work) and ensuring a steady workforce.
In summary, a conflict theorist would see gender socialization as a tool used by those in power to maintain their dominance and control over resources, thereby perpetuating gender inequality.