Questions: Which three settings are peer reviews commonly used? In a research setting to review and confirm data by other experts in a field of study In a college classroom to give feedback and constructive suggestions to fellow students In a medical setting that allows clients to review a doctor's medical knowledge In a work situation to help ensure accuracy and consistency through review of content

The three settings where peer reviews are commonly used are:

1. In a research setting to review and confirm data by other experts in a field of study: Peer review is a critical component of the academic and scientific research process. It involves experts in the same field evaluating the quality, validity, and significance of research before it is published. This process helps ensure the integrity and credibility of scholarly work.

2. In a college classroom to give feedback and constructive suggestions to fellow students: Peer review is often used in educational settings, particularly in writing and project-based courses. Students review each other's work to provide feedback, which helps improve the quality of the work and enhances learning by encouraging critical thinking and collaboration.

3. In a work situation to help ensure accuracy and consistency through review of content: In professional environments, peer reviews are used to maintain quality control and consistency in various types of work, such as reports, software code, or creative content. Colleagues review each other's work to catch errors, suggest improvements, and ensure that the final product meets the required standards.

The option "In a medical setting that allows clients to review a doctor's medical knowledge" is incorrect because peer review in the medical field typically involves medical professionals reviewing each other's work, such as research papers or clinical practices, rather than clients reviewing doctors.