Questions: Despite requests for a meeting or a hearing on these issues, the tribe was consistently denied the opportunity, and was ticketed for harassment of legislative leaders. The tribe was charged for harassing legislative leaders. The tribe has a constitutional argument against the charge under the 1st amendment, assembly clause 1st amendment, free exercise clause 1st amendment, redress of grievances clause 1st amendment, establishment clause

The answer is the 1st amendment, redress of grievances clause.

Explanation for each option:

1. 1st amendment, assembly clause: This clause protects the right of people to gather peacefully. While it is related to the tribe's ability to meet, the specific issue here is about addressing grievances, not just assembling.

2. 1st amendment, free exercise clause: This clause protects the right to practice one's religion freely. The situation described does not involve religious practice, so this clause is not applicable.

3. 1st amendment, redress of grievances clause: This clause protects the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The tribe's request for a meeting or hearing to address their issues falls under this clause, making it the most relevant constitutional argument against the charge of harassment.

4. 1st amendment, establishment clause: This clause prevents the government from establishing an official religion or unduly favoring one religion over another. It is not relevant to the tribe's situation as described in the question.