Questions: In which circumstance would the courts find libel? A reporter uses a source that incorrectly states a celebrity is using drugs A columnist writes his opinion about whether an actor is hiding a drug problem A reporter writes that local college students are drug dealers but has no sources A television reporter delivers a story about increased drug use at the local college.

The answer is: A reporter writes that local college students are drug dealers but has no sources.

This situation could potentially lead to a libel case if the statement is false, damaging to the celebrity's reputation, and made with negligence or malice. However, if the reporter relied on a source, the key issue would be whether the reporter acted with negligence in verifying the information.

Opinions are generally protected under the First Amendment, and for a statement to be considered libelous, it must be a false statement of fact. Since this is an opinion, it is less likely to be considered libel.

This is a clear case of potential libel because the reporter is making a factual claim without any sources to back it up. If the statement is false and damaging to the students' reputations, it could be considered libelous.

This statement is more general and does not single out specific individuals. It would be less likely to be considered libel unless it falsely accuses specific individuals or groups in a damaging way.