Questions: Question 2 1 pts A deductive argument can be a poor argument even if it is logically valid. True False Question 3 1 pts In general, it is reasonable to accept an unsupported claim as true when the claim does not conflict with personal experiences that we have no good reason to doubt. True False

Let's address each question one by one.

Question 2: A deductive argument can be a poor argument even if it is logically valid.

• The answer is True.

Explanation: A deductive argument is considered logically valid if the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. However, an argument can be logically valid but still be a poor argument if the premises themselves are not true or are not well-supported. For example, consider the following argument:

1. All birds can fly.
2. Penguins are birds.
3. Therefore, penguins can fly.

This argument is logically valid because if the premises were true, the conclusion would necessarily follow. However, the first premise is false because not all birds can fly (e.g., penguins and ostriches). Therefore, despite its logical validity, the argument is poor due to the false premise.

Question 3: In general, it is reasonable to accept an unsupported claim as true when the claim does not conflict with personal experiences that we have no good reason to doubt.

• The answer is False.

Explanation: Accepting an unsupported claim as true simply because it does not conflict with personal experiences is not a sound practice. Personal experiences can be subjective and limited, and they do not necessarily provide a reliable basis for accepting claims without further evidence. Critical thinking and skepticism are important in evaluating claims, and it is generally advisable to seek supporting evidence before accepting any claim as true, regardless of whether it conflicts with personal experiences.