The answer is d.) Ignorance makes it easier to get away with bad actions.
Kantian deontology is based on universal moral laws and principles, not on local customs. It emphasizes the importance of duty and the categorical imperative, which is a universal principle that applies to all rational beings. Therefore, this option does not represent a problem for Kantian deontology.
Kantian deontology does not base ethics on feelings. Instead, it focuses on rationality and the adherence to duty. Moral actions are determined by whether they can be universally applied, not by personal feelings or emotions. Thus, this option is not a problem for Kantian deontology.
In Kantian ethics, the intention behind an action is crucial. A good deed done with a bad intention would not be considered morally good because the moral worth of an action is determined by the intention and adherence to duty, not just the outcome. Therefore, this option does not represent a problem for Kantian deontology.
Kantian deontology assumes that individuals are rational and capable of understanding moral laws. However, if someone is ignorant of these laws, they might perform bad actions without realizing their moral implications. This can be seen as a potential problem because it challenges the assumption that all individuals are fully aware of their moral duties. Hence, this option represents a potential problem for Kantian deontology.