Questions: The firefighters for their bravery and strength in saving people from the fire. praising were praised were praising praised

The firefighters for their bravery and strength in saving people from the fire. praising were praised were praising praised
Transcript text: The firefighters $\qquad$ for their bravery and strength in saving people from the fire. praising were praised were praising praised
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is "were praised."

Explanation
Option 1: praising

This option is incorrect because "praising" is a present participle and does not fit grammatically in the sentence structure provided. It would imply that the firefighters themselves are doing the praising, which does not make sense in this context.

Option 2: were praised

This option is correct because "were praised" is the past passive form of the verb "praise," indicating that the firefighters received praise from others for their bravery and strength. This fits the context of the sentence, which describes an action that has already occurred.

Option 3: were praising

This option is incorrect because "were praising" is the past continuous form, suggesting that the firefighters were in the process of praising someone else, which does not align with the context of the sentence.

Option 4: praised

This option is incorrect because "praised" is the simple past tense, which would imply that the firefighters themselves performed the action of praising, rather than being the recipients of praise.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful

Questions asked by other users

failedAnswered
A bacterial strain is resistant to infection by a bacteriophage. Which statement is FALSE? Multiple Choice The bacterial host DNA is protected from restriction enzyme degradation by phosphorylation. The bacteria make restriction enzymes that degrade the virus genome. If the phage DNA was methylated, it would be protected from restriction enzyme degradation. The statements are ALL false. The bacterial host DNA is protected from restriction enzyme degradation by methylation.
failedAnswered
Government agencies keep data about the income distribution of the population. The Ramirez family and Cooper family live in a county with 6000 families. The Ramirez family's income is at the 88th percentile. The Cooper family's income is at the 16th percentile. (a) Which of the following must be true about the Ramirez family's and the Cooper family's incomes? - The Ramirez family earns more than the Cooper family. - Both the Ramirez family and the Cooper family earn more than the median income. - The Ramirez family earns 72,000 more than the Cooper family. - The Ramirez family and the Cooper family both have incomes in the bottom half of incomes in their county. (b) Which of the following must be true about the Ramirez family's income? - The Ramirez family earns more than about 12% of families in their county. - About 12% of the families in their county earn more than the Ramirez family. - The Ramirez family earns about 88% of the highest income in their county. - The Ramirez family earns about 12% of the highest income in their county.
failedAnswered
다음 급수의 수렴 여부를 판정하시오. (2) ∑(n=2 to ∞) ln(1+1/n)
failedAnswered
Find the indefinite integral and check the result by differentiation. (Remember the constant of integration.) ∫(7+8/t)^3(8/t^2) dt
failedAnswered
Evaluate the expression when n=8 n(1-n)=[?]