Questions: Some researchers believe that a child's athletic ability is purely the result of their genetic makeup. Others argue that a child's athletic ability is the product of their social environment (such as nutrition and opportunities to practice). This is a question of: a) Stability vs. plasticity b) Normativity vs. idiography c) Nature vs. nurture d) Continuity vs. discontinuity

The answer is c) Nature vs. nurture.

Explanation for each option:

a) Stability vs. plasticity: This concept refers to whether a person's traits remain stable over time (stability) or can change and adapt (plasticity). This is not directly related to the debate about the origins of athletic ability.

b) Normativity vs. idiography: Normativity refers to general principles or norms that apply to everyone, while idiography focuses on individual differences and unique cases. This does not directly address the debate about whether athletic ability is due to genetics or environment.

c) Nature vs. nurture: This is the correct answer. The nature vs. nurture debate centers on whether genetics (nature) or environmental factors (nurture) play a more significant role in shaping an individual's traits and abilities, including athletic ability.

d) Continuity vs. discontinuity: This concept deals with whether development is a smooth, continuous process or a series of distinct stages. This is not directly related to the debate about the origins of athletic ability.

In summary, the question is addressing the nature vs. nurture debate, which examines the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development and traits.