Questions: Multiple Choice Question The findings by Eden and Shani that individuals placed in a high potential group were perceived to have higher potential than those placed in regular potential group even though potential was never actually assessed reflects O a fundamental attribution error. O a self-fulfilling prophecy. O a self-serving bias. O actor/observer difference.

Multiple Choice Question The findings by Eden and Shani that individuals placed in a high potential group were perceived to have higher potential than those placed in regular potential group even though potential was never actually assessed reflects

O a fundamental attribution error.

O a self-fulfilling prophecy. O a self-serving bias.

O actor/observer difference.

Transcript text: Multiple Choice Question The findings by Eden and Shani that individuals placed in a high potential group were perceived to have higher potential than those placed in regular potential group even though potential was never actually assessed reflects O a fundamental attribution error. O a self-fulfilling prophecy. O a self-serving bias. O actor/observer difference.

Solution

Solution Steps

Step 1: Analyze the scenario

The scenario describes a situation where the initial placement in a group (high potential vs. regular potential) influenced the perception of individuals' potential, even without any actual assessment of their abilities.

Step 2: Identify the relevant psychological concept

This aligns with the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy. This concept describes how an initially false expectation can lead to its own confirmation. In this case, the expectation of high potential (due to group placement) led to the perception of high potential, fulfilling the initial prophecy.

Step 3: Eliminate other options

Fundamental attribution error refers to attributing behavior to internal factors rather than external factors. This doesn't fit the scenario as it's about expectation influencing perception, not attributing behavior to a cause.
Self-serving bias involves attributing positive outcomes to oneself and negative outcomes to external factors. This isn't relevant to the scenario.
Actor/observer difference describes the tendency to attribute one's own behavior to external factors while attributing others' behavior to internal factors. This also doesn't align with the scenario.

Final Answer

A self-fulfilling prophecy.

Was this solution helpful?

Unhelpful

Helpful

Questions asked by other users

Next >

Thank you for your feedback.

Copied!