Questions: Which of the following people would likely be satisfied with utilitarianism? Zach is looking for an ethical framework that considers the overall happiness of everyone produced by an action. Zoe is looking for an ethical framework that makes sure she is always happy. Zephaniah is looking for an ethical framework that fits well with religious belief. Zelie is looking for an ethical framework that says animal cruelty is always wrong.

The answer is Zach.

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that suggests that the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility. It considers the consequences of actions and aims to produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Therefore, Zach, who is looking for an ethical framework that considers the overall happiness of everyone, would likely be satisfied with utilitarianism.

Utilitarianism focuses on the overall happiness of everyone affected by an action, not just the happiness of a single individual. It may require personal sacrifices for the greater good, so it would not guarantee that Zoe is always happy. Therefore, utilitarianism may not satisfy Zoe's criteria.

Utilitarianism is a secular ethical theory and does not inherently align with any specific religious beliefs. While some religious principles may coincide with utilitarian outcomes, utilitarianism itself is not based on religious doctrine. Therefore, it may not fit well with Zephaniah's desire for an ethical framework that aligns with religious belief.

Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on their consequences and the overall happiness they produce. While it can be used to argue against animal cruelty if it leads to greater overall suffering, it does not categorically state that animal cruelty is always wrong. Therefore, it may not satisfy Zelie's criteria.