Questions: Question 37 2 pts You are rationally justified in accepting the view of the majority of experts in a given subject even if this viéw turns out later to have been incorrect. True False

The answer is True.

When considering whether you are rationally justified in accepting the view of the majority of experts, it's important to understand the basis of rational justification:

• Expert Consensus: In many fields, the consensus of experts is based on extensive research, peer review, and accumulated knowledge. Relying on this consensus is generally considered rational because it reflects the best available understanding at the time.
• Epistemic Responsibility: Individuals who are not experts in a field often lack the specialized knowledge required to critically evaluate complex information. Therefore, deferring to expert consensus is a responsible approach to forming beliefs.
• Historical Precedent: There are numerous instances in history where the majority view of experts was later revised or overturned. However, at the time, accepting the expert consensus was the most rational decision based on the available evidence.

• Possibility of Error: While expert consensus can be wrong, the possibility of error does not negate the rationality of accepting expert views. Rationality is about making the best decision with the information available, not guaranteeing correctness.
• Critical Thinking: Some might argue that individuals should always critically evaluate expert opinions. However, without the necessary expertise, this can lead to misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the data.

In conclusion, accepting the view of the majority of experts is rationally justified, even if it later turns out to be incorrect, because it is based on the best available evidence and understanding at the time.