Questions: What is the main limitation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act? - It only provides rights to victims of federal crimes - It does not require courts to ensure that victims are afforded their rights - It does not give victims the legal authority necessary to assert their rights in court - The Act does not have any limitations

The answer is: It does not give victims the legal authority necessary to assert their rights in court.

Explanation for each option:

1. It only provides rights to victims of federal crimes: This is not the main limitation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). While it is true that the CVRA primarily applies to federal crimes, this is not considered its main limitation.

2. It does not require courts to ensure that victims are afforded their rights: This statement is incorrect. The CVRA does require courts to ensure that victims are afforded their rights. The Act mandates that victims are given the right to be reasonably heard at public court proceedings, to confer with the attorney for the Government, and to be treated with fairness and respect for their dignity and privacy.

3. It does not give victims the legal authority necessary to assert their rights in court: This is the correct answer. One of the main criticisms of the CVRA is that while it enumerates various rights for crime victims, it does not provide them with the legal standing necessary to enforce these rights in court. This means that if a victim's rights are violated, they may not have a clear legal pathway to seek redress.

4. The Act does not have any limitations: This statement is incorrect. Like any piece of legislation, the CVRA has its limitations, and one of the most significant is the lack of legal authority for victims to assert their rights in court.

In summary, the main limitation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act is that it does not give victims the legal authority necessary to assert their rights in court.