Questions: Select the correct answer. A community group is upset because drivers speed through their neighborhood. They want the local government to install a stop sign or a speed bump to make drivers slow down. Which option might be the best way for them to accomplish this? A. They should go to the local government board meeting to plead their case. B. They should install their own sign even without the government's permission. C. They should stop paying property taxes until their demands are met. D. They should have a disruptive and rowdy protest in the middle of downtown. E. They should admit defeat because they know the government will never listen to them.

The answer is A. They should go to the local government board meeting to plead their case.

This is the most appropriate and effective method for addressing their concerns. Attending a local government board meeting allows the community group to formally present their issue and request action. It is a recognized and constructive way to engage with local authorities and seek a resolution.

This option is not advisable as it involves taking unauthorized action, which could lead to legal consequences. Installing a sign without permission may not be effective or enforceable and could result in fines or other penalties.

Refusing to pay property taxes is not a legal or effective way to address the issue. It could lead to serious financial and legal repercussions for the individuals involved, including penalties and potential loss of property.

While protests can be a way to draw attention to an issue, a disruptive and rowdy protest may not be well-received and could lead to negative consequences, such as arrests or public backlash. It is generally more effective to engage in peaceful and organized advocacy.

This option is defeatist and does not contribute to solving the problem. It is important for community groups to advocate for their needs and seek solutions through appropriate channels.