Questions: Which of the following best describes the CSI Effect? - Using forensic scientists as expert witnesses to explain physical and cyber evidence to a jury - The increase in true crime shows in the 2000s and how they affect courts - The hypothesis that watching CSI changes jurors' expectations of criminal evidence - The improvements in forensic evidence technology that mirror practices found in CSI

Which of the following best describes the CSI Effect?

- Using forensic scientists as expert witnesses to explain physical and cyber evidence to a jury
- The increase in true crime shows in the 2000s and how they affect courts
- The hypothesis that watching CSI changes jurors' expectations of criminal evidence
- The improvements in forensic evidence technology that mirror practices found in CSI

Transcript text: Which of the following best describes the CSI Effect? - Using forensic scientists as expert witnesses to explain physical and cyber evidence to a jury - The increase in true crime shows in the 2000s and how they affect courts - The hypothesis that watching CSI changes jurors' expectations of criminal evidence - The improvements in forensic evidence technology that mirror practices found in CSI

Solution

Answer

The answer is: The hypothesis that watching CSI changes jurors' expectations of criminal evidence

Explanation

Option 1: Using forensic scientists as expert witnesses to explain physical and cyber evidence to a jury

This option describes a common practice in legal proceedings but does not specifically relate to the CSI Effect, which is more about the influence of media on jurors' perceptions.

Option 2: The increase in true crime shows in the 2000s and how they affect courts

While true crime shows have become more popular, the CSI Effect specifically refers to the influence of fictional crime shows like CSI on jurors, not just any true crime media.

Option 3: The hypothesis that watching CSI changes jurors' expectations of criminal evidence

This option accurately describes the CSI Effect. It refers to the idea that jurors who watch shows like CSI may develop unrealistic expectations about the availability and conclusiveness of forensic evidence in real court cases.

Option 4: The improvements in forensic evidence technology that mirror practices found in CSI

This option describes advancements in forensic technology but does not capture the essence of the CSI Effect, which is about jurors' perceptions rather than technological developments.

Was this solution helpful?

Unhelpful

Helpful

Questions asked by other users

< Previous Next >

Thank you for your feedback.

Copied!