Questions: What is one possible result of the Supreme Court becoming more diverse over time? A. The Court has ruled against limiting affirmative action programs. B. The Court has not had to rule in equal protection cases C. The Court has interpreted equal protection as supporting expanded civil rights for minorities and women. D. The Court has applied strict scrutiny to a broader range of cases.

The answer is C. The Court has interpreted equal protection as supporting expanded civil rights for minorities and women.

While the Supreme Court has made various rulings on affirmative action, the diversity of the Court does not necessarily correlate directly with rulings against limiting affirmative action programs. The decisions on such programs have been mixed and depend on the specific cases and the justices' interpretations of the law.

This is incorrect because the Supreme Court has consistently ruled on equal protection cases throughout its history, regardless of its diversity. The Court's role includes interpreting the Constitution, which often involves equal protection issues.

A more diverse Supreme Court can bring a wider range of perspectives and experiences, which can influence the interpretation of equal protection under the law. This has historically led to rulings that expand civil rights for minorities and women, reflecting a broader understanding of equality and justice.

While the application of strict scrutiny is a significant aspect of constitutional law, it is not directly tied to the diversity of the Court. Strict scrutiny is applied based on the nature of the case and the rights involved, rather than the composition of the Court.