Questions: Which sentence below rewrites the following words as a negative Uds. command using indirect and direct object pronouns? Uds. / no arreglar / los pantalones / para nosotros A. No nos los arreglen. B. No se los arreglen. C. No los arrenglen. D. Arréglenoslos.

Which sentence below rewrites the following words as a negative Uds. command using indirect and direct object pronouns?

Uds. / no arreglar / los pantalones / para nosotros
A. No nos los arreglen.
B. No se los arreglen.
C. No los arrenglen.
D. Arréglenoslos.
Transcript text: Which sentence below rewrites the following words as a negative Uds. command using indirect and direct object pronouns? Uds. / no arreglar / los pantalones / para nosotros A. No nos los arreglen. B. No se los arreglen. C. No los arrenglen. D. Arréglenoslos.
failed

Solution

failed
failed

The answer is the first one (A): No nos los arreglen.

Explanation for each option: A. No nos los arreglen.

  • This is the correct answer. "Nos" is the indirect object pronoun for "nosotros" (us), and "los" is the direct object pronoun for "los pantalones" (the pants). The command "arreglen" is in the negative Uds. form, making the sentence "No nos los arreglen" correctly mean "Do not fix the pants for us."

B. No se los arreglen.

  • This is incorrect because "se" is not the correct indirect object pronoun for "nosotros" (us). "Se" is used for third-person indirect objects.

C. No los arrenglen.

  • This is incorrect because it does not include the indirect object pronoun "nos" and also contains a typo ("arrenglen" instead of "arreglen").

D. Arréglenoslos.

  • This is incorrect because it is an affirmative command, not a negative one. Additionally, it does not follow the structure required for a negative command.

Summary: The correct sentence that rewrites the given words as a negative Uds. command using indirect and direct object pronouns is "No nos los arreglen."

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful