Questions: Question 105 (1 point) Listen According to Rawls, what was the foundational misunderstanding of his theory? Ontological A compromise A priori Intuition A posterior

The answer is A priori: the original text in the question...

Explanation for each option:

1. Ontological: This term refers to the nature of being or existence. While ontology is a significant philosophical concept, it is not directly related to the foundational misunderstanding of Rawls' theory.

2. A compromise: Rawls' theory, particularly the "veil of ignorance" and the "original position," is not about compromise but about establishing principles of justice that are fair and impartial. Therefore, this is not the foundational misunderstanding.

3. A priori: Rawls' theory of justice is often misunderstood as being purely a priori, meaning it is based on theoretical deduction rather than empirical observation. However, Rawls intended his principles to be applicable in real-world scenarios, not just theoretical constructs. This misunderstanding is foundational because it affects how his theory is applied and interpreted.

4. Intuition: While intuition plays a role in Rawls' reflective equilibrium, it is not the foundational misunderstanding of his theory. His approach is more structured and systematic than relying solely on intuition.

5. A posteriori: This term refers to knowledge that is dependent on empirical evidence. Rawls' theory is not primarily based on empirical data but rather on hypothetical reasoning about justice. Thus, this is not the foundational misunderstanding.

In summary, the foundational misunderstanding of Rawls' theory is often related to its perceived a priori nature, which can lead to misinterpretations of its practical applicability.