Questions: Multiple Choice Question In Baby Theresa's example, ethicists against the immediate transplant of her organs argued that: it would be ethical to kill her before transplanting the organs it would benefit others without harming her it is better to be dead than alive if a person has no thoughts and feelings it is wrong to kill one person to save another

The answer is: it is wrong to kill one person to save another.

Explanation for each option:

1. It would be ethical to kill her before transplanting the organs: This option is incorrect. Ethicists generally do not argue that it is ethical to actively kill someone, even in cases where their organs could save others. The principle of "do no harm" is a fundamental ethical guideline in medicine.

2. It would benefit others without harming her: This option is incorrect. While the transplant of Baby Theresa's organs could potentially benefit others, the argument against it is that it would harm her by ending her life prematurely, which is considered unethical.

3. It is better to be dead than alive if a person has no thoughts and feelings: This option is incorrect. This is a philosophical stance rather than an ethical argument. Ethicists typically focus on the morality of actions rather than subjective assessments of quality of life.

4. It is wrong to kill one person to save another: This option is correct. Many ethicists argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end one person's life, even if doing so could save others. This principle is rooted in the belief that each individual's life has intrinsic value and should not be sacrificed for the benefit of others.