Questions: The following thesis statements are for an argument essay on the topic big game hunting. Which is the better thesis? Big game hunting should not be banned: It is a noble sport that actually helps conservation efforts in important ways. Big game hunting has been around since the hunter-gatherer era.

The better thesis statement is:

"Big game hunting should not be banned: It is a noble sport that actually helps conservation efforts in important ways."

Explanation:

1. Argumentative Clarity: This thesis clearly presents an argument that can be supported or refuted, which is essential for an argumentative essay. It takes a stance on the issue of big game hunting and provides a basis for discussion.

2. Specificity: The statement specifies a reason ("helps conservation efforts") that can be explored and supported with evidence, making it a strong foundation for an essay.

3. Relevance: It directly addresses the topic of big game hunting and its implications, which is crucial for maintaining focus in an argumentative essay.

In contrast, the second thesis, "Big game hunting has been around since the hunter-gatherer era," is more of a factual statement rather than an argument. It does not present a clear position or rationale that can be debated or supported with evidence.