Questions: Which 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case created the opportunity for those opposed to powerful incumbents to create organizations without having to disclose their donors? a) Bush v. Federal Election Commission b) McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission c) Clinton v. Patriot Citizens d) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Which 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case created the opportunity for those opposed to powerful incumbents to create organizations without having to disclose their donors? a) Bush v. Federal Election Commission b) McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission c) Clinton v. Patriot Citizens d) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Transcript text: Which 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case created the opportunity for those opposed to powerful incumbents to create organizations without having to disclose their donors? a) Bush v. Federal Election Commission b) McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission c) Clinton v. Patriot Citizens d) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is d) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Explanation
Option a: Bush v. Federal Election Commission

There is no notable Supreme Court case by this name. It seems to be a fictional or incorrect reference.

Option b: McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission

This case, decided in 2014, dealt with aggregate limits on individual contributions to national party and federal candidate committees. It did not address the creation of organizations without donor disclosure.

Option c: Clinton v. Patriot Citizens

This appears to be a fictional or incorrect reference, as there is no known Supreme Court case by this name.

Option d: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

This landmark 2009 case allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns, leading to the creation of Super PACs. These organizations can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates, and they are not required to disclose their donors, thus providing a way for those opposed to powerful incumbents to create organizations without donor disclosure.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful

Questions asked by other users

failedAnswered
Question: Which statement regarding the OSH Act is correct? Choose the correct option and then select Done. O Employers are obligated to furnish a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to their employees O Employers are not responsible for removing all hazards from the workplace. It is the job employee's to identify and remove all hazards dangerous or otherwise O Employees are obligated to furnish a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to their employers Done
failedAnswered
Aşağıdaki sayı doğrusunda bazı pozitif tam sayıların kareköküne karşlık gelen noktalar gösterilmiştir. B u sayı doğrusu üzerinde bulunan a ve b tam sayıları arasındaki nokta sayısı >a, b< sembolü ile gösteriliyor. Örneğin; >1,2<=2 Buna göre >2024,2025< ifadesinin eşiti kaçtır? A) 1 B) 44 C) 4048 D) 4049 E) 4050
failedAnswered
(a) Find parametric equations for the line through (4,2,4) that is perpendicular to the plane x-y+2z=2. (Use the parameter t.) (x(t), y(t), z(t))= (b) In what points does this line intersect the coordinate planes? xy-plane (x(t), y(t), z(t))= yz-plane (x(t), y(t), z(t))= xz-plane (x(t), y(t), z(t))=
failedAnswered
Write an equation for a rational function with: Vertical asymptotes at x=-4 and x=-1 x-intercepts at x=-3 and x=1 y-intercept at 8 y=
failedAnswered
Consider the figures below. Figure A Figure B (1) (a) Use the rectangles in each graph to approximate the area of the region bounded by y=sin(x), y=0, x=0, and x=π. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) Figure A Figure B