In a poll of 510 human resource professionals, \( 45.7\% \) indicated that body piercings and tattoos were significant personal grooming red flags. The number of professionals who expressed this opinion can be calculated as follows:
\[
\text{Number} = 510 \times 0.457 = 233
\]
Thus, the number of HR professionals who said that body piercings and tattoos were big personal grooming red flags is \( \boxed{233} \).
To construct a \( 99\% \) confidence interval for the proportion of all human resource professionals who believe that body piercings and tattoos are significant grooming red flags, we use the formula:
\[
\hat{p} \pm z \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}}
\]
Where:
- \( \hat{p} = 0.457 \)
- \( n = 510 \)
- \( z \) for \( 99\% \) confidence level is approximately \( 2.576 \)
Calculating the margin of error:
\[
\text{Margin of Error} = 2.576 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{0.457(1 - 0.457)}{510}} \approx 0.057
\]
Thus, the confidence interval is:
\[
0.457 \pm 0.057 \implies (0.400, 0.514)
\]
The \( 99\% \) confidence interval is \( \boxed{(0.400, 0.514)} \).
For an \( 80\% \) confidence interval, we again use the same formula, but with \( z \) for \( 80\% \) confidence level, which is approximately \( 1.282 \):
Calculating the margin of error:
\[
\text{Margin of Error} = 1.282 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{0.457(1 - 0.457)}{510}} \approx 0.028
\]
Thus, the confidence interval is:
\[
0.457 \pm 0.028 \implies (0.429, 0.485)
\]
The \( 80\% \) confidence interval is \( \boxed{(0.429, 0.485)} \).
- Number of HR professionals: \( \boxed{233} \)
- 99% confidence interval: \( \boxed{(0.400, 0.514)} \)
- 80% confidence interval: \( \boxed{(0.429, 0.485)} \)