Questions: One criticism of the structural functionalist view of social class is that the paradigm cannot account for why celebrities and professional athletes have higher income than nurses and firefighters. Wealth and income are defined by sociologists as the amount of money from one's job.

One criticism of the structural functionalist view of social class is that the paradigm cannot account for why celebrities and professional athletes have higher income than nurses and firefighters. Wealth and income are defined by sociologists as the amount of money from one's job.
Transcript text: One criticism of the structural functionalist view of social class is that the paradigm cannot account for why celebrities and professional athletes have higher income than nurses and firefighters. Wealth and income are defined by sociologists as the amount of money from one's job.
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer to Question 7 is True.

Explanation
Option 1: True

The structural functionalist perspective posits that social stratification and the distribution of resources are necessary for the functioning of society. It suggests that different roles in society are rewarded based on their importance and the skills required. However, this view struggles to explain why individuals in entertainment and sports, such as celebrities and professional athletes, often earn significantly more than those in essential roles like nurses and firefighters. These discrepancies challenge the idea that income is solely based on the functional importance of a role.

Option 2: False

If this option were true, it would imply that the structural functionalist view can adequately explain the income differences between celebrities and essential workers, which it does not. Therefore, this option is incorrect.

Answer

The answer to Question 8 is False.

Explanation
Option 1: True

If this statement were true, it would mean that sociologists define wealth and income solely as the money earned from one's job. However, sociologists consider wealth to include all assets owned, such as property, investments, and savings, while income refers to the money received, often from work, but also from other sources like dividends or rental income.

Option 2: False

This option is correct because sociologists define wealth as the total value of all assets owned by an individual or household, and income as the flow of money received, not just from employment but from various sources. Therefore, the statement is false.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful

Questions asked by other users

failedAnswered
Introducing the Unit Circle Example #2: 45 Degree Reference Angle Using Triangles in the Unit Circle: A unit circle is graphed on the coordinate plane. - Notice that a line segment can be drawn from any point on the unit circle with coordinates (x, y) perpendicular to the x-axis. - This line segment will form a right triangle with the radius as the hypotenuse. In this section, you will use special right triangles to show that any point on the unit circle satisfies the equation of the unit circle. Enter the coordinates (x, y) of the point shown on the coordinate plane, using the exact values of x and y. If your answer is correct, you will see "(0" next to your answer. Submit
failedAnswered
(b) Σ from n=2 to ∞ of (-1)^n * 5/ln(n)
failedAnswered
In economics, firms are assumed to maximize profits. consumer satisfaction. output prices. the quantity of production.
failedAnswered
National Poison Control Center
failedAnswered
It is fair to say that the Sioux Treaty of 1868 was followed by a national policy toward Native Americans on the plains that is best described as Multiple Choice genocide. pacification. scorched earth. skilled diplomacy.