Questions: Use the speech excerpt to answer the question. Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker's argument? (1 point) Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer. Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries. A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests. And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote. Search

Use the speech excerpt to answer the question.
Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker's argument?
(1 point)

Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.

Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.

A higher percentage of people approved of
building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.

And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
Search
Transcript text: Use the speech excerpt to answer the question. Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker's argument? (1 point) Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer. Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries. A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests. And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote. Search
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is: "And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote."

Explanation
Option 1: Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.

This evidence is relevant because it directly supports the argument that the process of voting is perceived as fairer by the citizens.

Option 2: Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.

This evidence is relevant because it supports the argument that voting is a more efficient method compared to judging individual contest entries.

Option 3: A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.

This evidence is relevant because it shows that the outcome of voting is more widely accepted by the community, which strengthens the speaker's argument.

Option 4: And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.

This evidence is least relevant because it does not directly support the speaker's argument about the fairness, efficiency, or approval of the voting process. It merely provides an example of another town's action without explaining its impact or relevance to the speaker's main points.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful