Questions: Which statement best represents the reasoning the author of "Benefits of an Arranged Marriage" used? A) Arranged marriages increase in satisfaction over time, so they may be preferable to self-selected marriages. B) All self-selected marriages end in divorce, so arranged marriages are better. C) There's no statistical difference between arranged and self-selected marriages when it comes to the satisfaction of the partners involved. D) Since arranged marriages are less likely to have early family support, selfselected marriages usually last longer.

The answer is A) Arranged marriages increase in satisfaction over time, so they may be preferable to self-selected marriages.

This statement suggests that arranged marriages have a tendency to improve in terms of satisfaction as time progresses, which could make them a more favorable option compared to self-selected marriages. This reasoning aligns with some studies and theories that propose that the initial lack of romantic love in arranged marriages can develop over time, leading to increased satisfaction.

This statement is factually incorrect and overly generalized. Not all self-selected marriages end in divorce, and such a claim lacks empirical support. Therefore, it is unlikely that the author would use this reasoning.

While this statement could be true in some contexts, it does not support the idea that arranged marriages might be preferable. It suggests parity rather than a preference for one type over the other.

This statement is not a common argument in favor of arranged marriages. In fact, arranged marriages often involve significant family support, which can contribute to their stability. Therefore, this reasoning does not align with the typical arguments presented in favor of arranged marriages.