Questions: UNIT 3 - CHALLENGE 3.2: Kantian Deonts Which of the following represents a potential problem for Kantian deontology? a.) People are allowed to be used as objects. b.) Different people have to follow different rules. c.) Feelings have no place in ethical discussions. d.) Intention doesn't have enough weight.

The answer is c.) Feelings have no place in ethical discussions.

Kantian deontology is fundamentally opposed to using people as mere means to an end. One of Kant's central tenets is the "Formula of Humanity," which states that we should treat humanity, whether in ourselves or others, always as an end and never merely as a means. Therefore, this option does not represent a problem for Kantian deontology.

Kantian ethics is based on the idea of universalizability, meaning that moral rules should apply to everyone equally. The categorical imperative requires that one act only according to maxims that can be willed as universal laws. Thus, this option is not a problem for Kantian deontology, as it actually contradicts its principles.

Kantian deontology emphasizes duty and reason over emotions in ethical decision-making. Kant believed that moral actions are those performed out of duty and adherence to moral law, rather than based on feelings or consequences. This can be seen as a potential problem because it may lead to rigid or overly rational decisions that ignore human emotions and context.

In fact, Kantian ethics places significant emphasis on intention. According to Kant, the moral worth of an action is determined by the intention behind it, rather than its consequences. Therefore, this option does not represent a problem for Kantian deontology.