To determine the sample size required without making any assumptions about the product response rate, we use the formula for sample size estimation for a proportion:
\[
n = \frac{Z^2 \cdot p \cdot (1 - p)}{E^2}
\]
Where:
- \( Z \) is the Z-score for a 95% confidence level, which is approximately \( 1.96 \).
- \( p \) is the estimated proportion, and in the absence of any assumptions, we use the worst-case scenario \( p = 0.5 \).
- \( E \) is the margin of error, which is \( 0.02 \).
Substituting the values:
\[
n = \frac{(1.96)^2 \cdot 0.5 \cdot (1 - 0.5)}{(0.02)^2} = \frac{(3.8416) \cdot 0.5 \cdot 0.5}{0.0004} = \frac{0.9604}{0.0004} = 2401
\]
Thus, the sample size required without assumptions is:
\[
\boxed{n = 2401}
\]
Historically, the product response rates for this company have ranged from \( 0.5\% \) to \( 6.7\% \). We will use the midpoint of this range as the estimated proportion:
\[
p = \frac{0.005 + 0.067}{2} = \frac{0.072}{2} = 0.036
\]
Using the same formula for sample size:
\[
n = \frac{Z^2 \cdot p \cdot (1 - p)}{E^2}
\]
Substituting the values:
\[
n = \frac{(1.96)^2 \cdot 0.036 \cdot (1 - 0.036)}{(0.02)^2} = \frac{(3.8416) \cdot 0.036 \cdot 0.964}{0.0004}
\]
Calculating the numerator:
\[
3.8416 \cdot 0.036 \cdot 0.964 \approx 0.135
\]
Thus,
\[
n = \frac{0.135}{0.0004} = 337.5
\]
Rounding up to the nearest whole number gives:
\[
\boxed{n = 334}
\]
The comparison of the sample sizes calculated in Steps 1 and 2 shows a significant reduction in the required sample size when using a likely range for \( p \):
- Without assumptions: \( n = 2401 \)
- With assumptions: \( n = 334 \)
This indicates that using historical data to estimate the response rate can greatly reduce the sample size needed for accurate estimation.
- Sample size without assumptions: \( \boxed{n = 2401} \)
- Sample size with assumptions: \( \boxed{n = 334} \)