Questions: Budziszewski suggests the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s has produced a sexual landscape with four "corners," ("Designed for Sex: What We Lose When We Forget What Sex Is For") but none of these lead to human flourishing and healthy human relationships. and while corner "C" has its flaws, it nevertheless fulfills the unitive purpose of marriage. and corner "D" is the wave of the future. and corner "B" is the worst.

The question refers to J. Budziszewski's analysis of the sexual revolution and its impact on human relationships, as discussed in his work "Designed for Sex: What We Lose When We Forget What Sex Is For." Budziszewski uses the metaphor of a "sexual landscape" with four "corners" to describe different approaches to sexuality that emerged from the 1960s sexual revolution. Here's a breakdown of the corners based on the information provided:

1. Corner B: This is described as the worst of the four corners. While the text does not specify what Corner B entails, it can be inferred that it represents a particularly detrimental approach to sexuality, possibly characterized by behaviors or attitudes that are harmful to individuals and relationships.

2. Corner C: Although it has its flaws, Corner C is noted for fulfilling the unitive purpose of marriage. This suggests that while it may not be perfect, it aligns more closely with traditional views of marriage, emphasizing the emotional and spiritual union between partners.

3. Corner D: Referred to as the "wave of the future," Corner D likely represents a more modern or progressive approach to sexuality. This could involve new norms or practices that are becoming more accepted in contemporary society.

4. General Analysis: Budziszewski argues that none of these corners lead to human flourishing and healthy human relationships. This implies a critique of the sexual revolution's impact, suggesting that the changes it brought about have not necessarily resulted in better or more fulfilling relationships.

In summary, Budziszewski's analysis is critical of the sexual revolution, highlighting various approaches to sexuality that have emerged and their shortcomings in promoting genuine human connection and well-being.