Questions: Thesis The is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory. Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.

Thesis The is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory. Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.
Transcript text: Thesis The $\qquad$ is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The $\qquad$ is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory. Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is $\qquad$ to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as $\qquad$ evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.
failed

Solution

failed
failed

The answer is:

The "thesis" is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The "evidence" is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory.

Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is "difficult" to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as "much" evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.

Explanation:

  1. Thesis: In historical writing, a thesis is the central argument or claim that a historian is trying to prove. It is the main point around which the historian's research and analysis are centered.

  2. Evidence: Historical evidence consists of primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their thesis. This can include documents, artifacts, testimonies, and other materials that provide information about the past.

  3. Difficult: Proving a thesis with absolute certainty is challenging because historical evidence is often incomplete or fragmented. Historians must piece together available evidence to form a coherent argument.

  4. Much: To make a convincing argument, historians aim to gather as much evidence as possible. This helps to strengthen their thesis and provide a well-rounded interpretation of historical events.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful

Questions asked by other users

failedAnswered
A ray in glass (n=1.51) reaches a boundary with air at 49.2 deg. Does it reflect internally or refract into the air? Enter 0 for reflect, and 1 for refract. (Water n=1.33, Air n=1.00)
failedAnswered
When the percentage of city employees who ride the bus to work is 10 percentage points higher in City B than in City A, what percentage of city employees in City B ride the bus to work? % (Type an integer or a decimal.)
failedAnswered
he wasn't lying. "Give me another beer," I said. Then someone called him from the back, and he drew the beer and left. I drank it slowly, hoping Brother Maceo would appear before I had finished. When he didn't I waved to Barrelhouse and left for the district. Perhaps Brother Tarp could explain; or at least tell me something about Clifton. I walked through the dark block over to Seventh and started down; things were beginning to look serious. Along the way I saw not a single sign of Brotherhood activity. In a hot side street I came upon a couple striking matches along the curb, kneeling as though looking for a lost coin, the matches flaring dimly in their faces. Then I found myself in a strangely familiar block and broke out in a sweat: I had walked almost to Mary's door, and turned now and hurried away. Barrelhouse had prepared me for the darkened windows of the district, but not, when I let myself in, to call in vain through the dark to Brother Tarp. I went to the room where he slept, but he was not there; then I went through the dark hall to my old office and threw myself into my desk chair, exhausted. Everything seemed to be slipping away from me and I could find no quick absorbing action that would get it under control. I tried to think of whom among the district committee I might call for information concerning Clifton, but here again I was balked. For if I selected one who believed that I had requested to be transferred because I hated my own people it would only complicate matters. No doubt there would be some who'd resent my return, so it was best to confront them all at once without giving any one of them the opportunity to organize any sentiment against me. It was best that I talk with Brother Tarp, whom I trusted. When he came in he could give me an idea of the state of affairs, and perhaps tell me what had actually happened to Clifton. But Brother Tarp didn't arrive. I went out and got a
failedAnswered
accelerating to the right fast speed slow speed accelerating to the left
failedAnswered
Find the area. The area of the triangle is m²