Questions: Thesis The is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory. Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.

Thesis

The is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory.

Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.
Transcript text: Thesis The $\qquad$ is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The $\qquad$ is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory. Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is $\qquad$ to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as $\qquad$ evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.
failed

Solution

failed
failed

The answer is:

The "thesis" is the particular viewpoint or theory for which a historian provides support. The "evidence" is composed of historical sources that provide support for a historian's viewpoint or theory.

Because historical events are not directly observable, and the evidence necessary to support the thesis of an argument may be fragmented or incomplete, it is "difficult" to prove a thesis with absolute certainty. In light of this, it is the task of historians to provide as "much" evidence as possible to support their theses, thereby providing the most convincing, well-supported interpretation of historical events.

Explanation:

  1. Thesis: In historical writing, a thesis is the central argument or claim that a historian is trying to prove. It is the main point around which the historian's research and analysis are centered.

  2. Evidence: Historical evidence consists of primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their thesis. This can include documents, artifacts, testimonies, and other materials that provide information about the past.

  3. Difficult: Proving a thesis with absolute certainty is challenging because historical evidence is often incomplete or fragmented. Historians must piece together available evidence to form a coherent argument.

  4. Much: To make a convincing argument, historians aim to gather as much evidence as possible. This helps to strengthen their thesis and provide a well-rounded interpretation of historical events.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful