Questions: Which explains how mass media has changed the role of the presidency? The president uses mass media to speak to people all over the world. The president uses mass media to veto bills passed by Congress. The president uses mass media to communicate with Congress. The president uses mass media to generate support for executive orders.

The answer is: The president uses mass media to generate support for executive orders.

While it is true that the president can use mass media to communicate globally, this option does not specifically address how mass media has changed the role of the presidency. The ability to speak to a global audience is more about the reach of communication rather than a change in the presidential role.

This option is incorrect because the veto process is a formal legislative procedure that does not involve mass media. The president must send a veto message to Congress, and while the media may report on it, the act of vetoing is not conducted through mass media.

While the president may use mass media to indirectly influence Congress by swaying public opinion, direct communication with Congress typically occurs through formal channels such as speeches, letters, or meetings. Mass media is not the primary tool for direct communication with Congress.

This option accurately reflects how mass media has changed the role of the presidency. By using mass media, the president can directly appeal to the public to gain support for executive orders and other initiatives. This ability to shape public opinion and rally support is a significant change in the presidential role, as it allows the president to bypass traditional political processes and directly engage with the electorate.