Questions: Identify the author's purpose Read the text. I was very concerned by the school board's recent announcement that lunch breaks will be shortened next year. This may seem like a good idea now, but in the long run it will only hurt students. The current lunch break gives students a chance to exercise and breathe fresh air. More importantly, it lets them take a break from their hard work. Shorter lunches don't give students enough time for a real break. For the sake of all students, contact the school board today and let them know that breaks matter! Which author's purpose is suggested by the text? to persuade readers to speak out against shorter lunch breaks to inform readers about why lunch breaks are being shortened to describe how students feel about shorter lunch breaks

The answer is: to persuade readers to speak out against shorter lunch breaks.

Explanation for each option:

1. To persuade readers to speak out against shorter lunch breaks:

   • This is the correct answer. The text clearly aims to convince readers to take action against the decision to shorten lunch breaks. Phrases like "I was very concerned," "it will only hurt students," and "contact the school board today and let them know that breaks matter!" are indicative of a persuasive intent.

2. To inform readers about why lunch breaks are being shortened:

   • This is incorrect. The text does not provide any reasons or explanations for why the lunch breaks are being shortened. It focuses on the negative consequences of the decision rather than the rationale behind it.

3. To describe how students feel about shorter lunch breaks:

   • This is incorrect. While the text does mention that shorter lunches are not beneficial for students, it does not delve into the specific feelings or opinions of the students themselves. The primary focus is on persuading the readers to oppose the decision.

In summary, the author's purpose is to persuade readers to take action against the shortening of lunch breaks.