Questions: The statement is not valid because the more an item costs, the longer its warranty should be. The statement is not valid because there is no positive relationship between cost and warranty length. The statement is valid because more expensive televisions always have longer warranties. The statement is valid because the more an item costs, the longer its warranty is guaranteed to last. Discuss the statement and its MAIN possible message or meaning. Choose the correct answer above. Compare/ analyze/ discuss how the television set's cost may influence the length of the warranty. Compare/ analyze/ discuss how the warranty's length may influence the cost. Describe what a Company B television set that costs 400 more than Company A's television set with a longer warranty suggests.

The answer is B. The statement is not valid because there is no positive relationship between cost and warranty length.

The cost of a television set may influence the length of the warranty in some cases, as companies might offer longer warranties on higher-end products to provide additional assurance to customers. However, this is not a strict rule, and many companies offer standard warranties regardless of the product's price.

Conversely, the length of a warranty might influence the perceived value of a television set. A longer warranty can be seen as a sign of quality and reliability, potentially justifying a higher price. However, this perception varies among consumers and is not a definitive factor in pricing.

If Company B offers a television set that costs $400 more than Company A's but comes with a longer warranty, it suggests that Company B might be positioning its product as a premium option, potentially offering better quality or additional features. The longer warranty could be a strategy to differentiate the product and justify the higher price, appealing to consumers who value extended protection and assurance.