The answer to Question 21 is A: maintain the variety of social relationships with other people that we want to have.
Explanation for each option:
a) Maintain the variety of social relationships with other people that we want to have: This is the correct answer. James Rachels argues that privacy is essential for maintaining different types of social relationships. Without privacy, it would be difficult to manage the different roles and relationships we have with various people in our lives.
b) Maintain the social status that we have come to enjoy: While social status might be affected by privacy, Rachels' primary argument is not centered on maintaining social status but rather on the ability to manage different social relationships.
c) Have peace of mind: Although privacy can contribute to peace of mind, Rachels' argument is more focused on the practical aspect of managing social relationships rather than the psychological benefit of peace of mind.
d) Prevent embarrassment to ourselves: Preventing embarrassment is a potential benefit of privacy, but it is not the core argument Rachels makes. His main point is about the necessity of privacy for managing social relationships.
For Question 22, the answer is not provided in the text. However, based on the context of the question, Schwartz likely discusses the balance between compassion and another important aspect of medical ethics or practice, such as honesty, patient autonomy, or professional integrity. To provide a precise answer, one would need to refer to the specific content of Shelly K. Schwartz's work "Is It Ever OK to Lie to Patients?"