Questions: Why is it important to have a logical and standardized way to do science? - It is the way that it has always been done. - Scientists can verify the findings of another scientist. - The results can easily be published in a scientific journal. - There should be a strict plan that only scientists know how to follow. - I don't know

Why is it important to have a logical and standardized way to do science?
- It is the way that it has always been done.
- Scientists can verify the findings of another scientist.
- The results can easily be published in a scientific journal.
- There should be a strict plan that only scientists know how to follow.
- I don't know
Transcript text: adapt.careered.com Technical University... CTU Portal: Login Portal: Gradebook for SCl101 he Scientific Way of Thinking / Learning map / Learn: The Scientific Method c Method Question 2 Why is it important to have a logical and standardized way to do science? It is the way that it has always been done. Scientists can verify the findings of another scientist. The results can easily be published in a scientific journal. There should be a strict plan that only scientists know how to follow. $\square$ I don't know One attempt You answered 0 out of 1 correctly. Asking up to 10. Submit answer Exit
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is: Scientists can verify the findings of another scientist.

Explanation
Option 1: It is the way that it has always been done.

This option is not correct because the historical method of doing science has evolved over time. The importance of a logical and standardized way to do science is not merely because it has always been done that way, but because it ensures reliability and reproducibility.

Option 2: Scientists can verify the findings of another scientist.

This is the correct answer. A logical and standardized approach allows other scientists to replicate experiments and verify results, which is a cornerstone of scientific progress. Verification by independent researchers helps to confirm the validity of findings and builds a robust body of scientific knowledge.

Option 3: The results can easily be published in a scientific journal.

While standardized methods do facilitate the publication process, the primary importance lies in the ability to verify findings. Publication is a secondary benefit that stems from the reproducibility and reliability of standardized methods.

Option 4: There should be a strict plan that only scientists know how to follow.

This option is incorrect because science should be transparent and accessible. A strict plan known only to scientists would hinder the collaborative and open nature of scientific inquiry. The goal is to have methods that are clear and understandable so that anyone with the necessary skills can follow and verify them.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful