Questions: What do authors of scientific texts do to provide evidence? A) Use reasoning B) Cite sources C) Provide a summary D) State claims

The answer is B) Cite sources

While reasoning is an important part of scientific writing, it is not the primary method for providing evidence. Reasoning helps to interpret and explain the evidence, but it does not constitute evidence itself.

Citing sources is a fundamental practice in scientific writing to provide evidence. Authors refer to previous research, experiments, and data to support their claims and arguments. This practice not only lends credibility to their work but also allows readers to verify the information and explore further.

Providing a summary is a way to condense information, but it does not serve as evidence. Summaries are useful for giving an overview of the research or findings but do not provide the detailed support that citing sources does.

Stating claims is part of presenting an argument or hypothesis, but claims themselves are not evidence. Evidence is needed to support these claims, which is often done through citing sources.