Questions: Part 3: The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Making Inferences and Predictions Analyzing internal conflicts helps the reader to discredit textual evidence, discover background knowledge, create comprehension strategies, make inferences and predictions.

The answer is make inferences and predictions.

Analyzing internal conflicts does not lead to discrediting textual evidence. Instead, it helps to understand the motivations and struggles of characters, which can enhance the credibility and depth of the text.

While analyzing internal conflicts might provide some insights into a character's background, it is not primarily about discovering background knowledge. Background knowledge is usually gathered from explicit information provided in the text or through research.

Creating comprehension strategies involves developing methods to better understand and retain information from the text. While analyzing internal conflicts can be a part of comprehension strategies, it is not the primary outcome.

Analyzing internal conflicts allows readers to delve deeper into the characters' minds, understanding their motivations and potential future actions. This understanding enables readers to make inferences about the characters' behavior and predict future events in the narrative. This is particularly relevant in "The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," where the internal conflict between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is central to the plot and themes.