Questions: Question 33 On the question of free will, Kant is a skeptic. libertarian. hard determinist. compatibilist. Question 34 Kant believed you needed to wait and see the consequences of an action to see if it is right or wrong. True False Question 35 Using the categorical imperative, Kant would find suicide morally impermissible. morally permissible. morally recommended (an imperfect duty).

The answer is libertarian.

Kant is not typically classified as a skeptic regarding free will. Skepticism would imply doubt or uncertainty about the existence of free will, which does not align with Kant's philosophical stance.

Kant is often associated with libertarianism in the context of free will because he believed in the autonomy of the will and that humans have the capacity to make free choices that are not determined by prior causes. This aligns with the libertarian view that free will is incompatible with determinism.

Hard determinism is the view that free will does not exist because every event or state of affairs, including human actions, is determined by preceding events in accordance with the natural laws. Kant did not hold this view, as he believed in the possibility of free will.

Compatibilism is the belief that free will and determinism are compatible. While Kant did explore the relationship between free will and determinism, he is not typically classified as a compatibilist because he emphasized the autonomy of the will in a way that suggests a more libertarian perspective.

The answer is False.

Kant's ethical theory is deontological, meaning it is concerned with the inherent morality of actions rather than their consequences. According to Kant, the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by whether it adheres to a moral law or principle, such as the categorical imperative, rather than by its outcomes.

The answer is morally impermissible.

Kant's categorical imperative requires that actions be universalizable and respect the inherent dignity of individuals. Suicide, according to Kant, fails the test of universalizability because if everyone were to commit suicide, it would lead to a contradiction in the will. Additionally, it does not respect the inherent worth of the individual, as it treats the person merely as a means to an end (escaping suffering), rather than as an end in themselves. Therefore, Kant would find suicide morally impermissible.