Questions: Which of these is a statement of opinion? A. In 1973, biologists in Arkansas estimated that as many as 700 bears roamed the state's mountains. B. The AGFC bear restoration program would have be just as successful if the public had been informed about it. C. A ban on hunting instituted by the AGFC was effective in doubling the number of black bears in Arkansas. D. For the first five years of the AGFC's restoration program, workers released mostly male bears into the mountains.

Which of these is a statement of opinion?
A. In 1973, biologists in Arkansas estimated that as many as 700 bears roamed the state's mountains.
B. The AGFC bear restoration program would have be just as successful if the public had been informed about it.
C. A ban on hunting instituted by the AGFC was effective in doubling the number of black bears in Arkansas.
D. For the first five years of the AGFC's restoration program, workers released mostly male bears into the mountains.
Transcript text: Which of these is a statement of opinion? A. In 1973, biologists in Arkansas estimated that as many as 700 bears roamed the state's mountains. B. The AGFC bear restoration program would have be just as successful if the public had been informed about it. C. A ban on hunting instituted by the AGFC was effective in doubling the number of black bears in Arkansas. D. For the first five years of the AGFC's restoration program, workers released mostly male bears into the mountains.
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is B. The AGFC bear restoration program would have be just as successful if the public had been informed about it.

Explanation
Option A: In 1973, biologists in Arkansas estimated that as many as 700 bears roamed the state's mountains.

This is a statement of fact, as it refers to a specific estimate made by biologists in a particular year.

Option B: The AGFC bear restoration program would have be just as successful if the public had been informed about it.

This is a statement of opinion, as it reflects a belief or judgment about the potential outcome of the program under different circumstances. It is not a verifiable fact.

Option C: A ban on hunting instituted by the AGFC was effective in doubling the number of black bears in Arkansas.

This is a statement of fact, as it describes a specific action (a ban on hunting) and its measurable outcome (doubling the number of black bears).

Option D: For the first five years of the AGFC's restoration program, workers released mostly male bears into the mountains.

This is a statement of fact, as it provides specific information about the actions taken during the restoration program.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful