Questions: How would you categorize the context of a tweet, which relies on text alone, without the benefit of the sender's voice or gestures? (Ch. 1) - channel-rich - channel-full - channel-less - channel-lean

How would you categorize the context of a tweet, which relies on text alone, without the benefit of the sender's voice or gestures? (Ch. 1)
- channel-rich
- channel-full
- channel-less
- channel-lean
Transcript text: Question 39 2 pts How would you categorize the context of a tweet," which relies on text alone. without the benefit of the sender's voice or gestures? (Ch. 1) channel-rich channel-full channel tess channel-lean
failed

Solution

failed
failed
Answer

The answer is channel-lean.

Explanation
Option 1: Channel-rich

A channel-rich context involves multiple channels of communication, such as voice, gestures, facial expressions, and text. This is not applicable to a tweet, which relies solely on text.

Option 2: Channel-full

This term is not commonly used in communication theory and does not accurately describe the context of a tweet.

Option 3: Channel tess

This term is not recognized in communication theory and does not apply to the context of a tweet.

Option 4: Channel-lean

A channel-lean context relies on fewer channels of communication, typically just text. Tweets are a prime example of channel-lean communication because they depend solely on written text without the aid of non-verbal cues like voice tone or body language.

Was this solution helpful?
failed
Unhelpful
failed
Helpful