Questions: Suppose the federal government blocks the states from imposing taxes on high speed internet service. Which of the following would allow it to do so? preemption state's rights devolution home rule

The answer is preemption.

Explanation for each option:

1. Preemption: This is the correct answer. Preemption refers to the principle that federal law takes precedence over state laws. When the federal government enacts legislation that conflicts with state laws, the federal law will override the state laws. In this case, if the federal government blocks states from imposing taxes on high-speed internet service, it is exercising its preemption power to ensure that federal policy is uniformly applied across all states.

2. State's Rights: This concept refers to the political powers that U.S. states possess in relation to the federal government. It emphasizes the rights and powers held by individual states rather than by the federal government. If the federal government is blocking states from imposing taxes, it is not an example of state's rights, but rather a limitation on them.

3. Devolution: This term refers to the transfer or delegation of power from a central government to regional or local governments. It is the opposite of what is happening in this scenario, as devolution would involve giving more power to the states, not restricting them.

4. Home Rule: This is a form of self-governance granted to local governments, allowing them to pass laws and govern themselves with less interference from the state government. It is not applicable in this context, as the question involves the relationship between federal and state governments, not local governance.