Questions: Chapter 10Hypothesis Testing: Computations
d. Refer to the cancer data referenced in Question 2. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of breast cancer patients treated with ascorbate who will survive more than a year is larger than 0.75. Assume a Type I error rate of a=0.05. Report a p-value, say whether you chose HA or not, and explain why you made the choice you did. Are you surprised by this outcome? Why or why not?
Transcript text: Chapter 10|Hypothesis Testing: Computations
d. Refer to the cancer data referenced in Question 2. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of breast cancer patients treated with ascorbate who will survive more than a year is larger than 0.75. Assume a Type I error rate of $a=0.05$. Report a $p$-value, say whether you chose $H_{A}$ or not, and explain why you made the choice you did. Are you surprised by this outcome? Why or why not?
Solution
Solution Steps
Step 1: Hypothesis Formulation
We are testing the hypothesis regarding the proportion of breast cancer patients treated with ascorbate who survive more than a year. The null and alternative hypotheses are defined as follows:
Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \(p \leq 0.75\)
Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_A\)): \(p > 0.75\)
Step 2: Test Statistic Calculation
The test statistic for the proportion is calculated using the formula:
\[
Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}}}
\]
The p-value associated with the calculated test statistic \(Z = 1.1547\) is found to be:
\[
\text{P-value} = 0.1241
\]
Step 4: Critical Region and Decision
For a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\) in a one-tailed test, the critical value is:
\[
Z_{\text{critical}} = 1.6449
\]
Since the calculated test statistic \(Z = 1.1547\) does not exceed the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step 5: Conclusion
Based on the p-value:
Since \(0.1241 > 0.05\), we do not have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of breast cancer patients treated with ascorbate who survive more than a year is larger than 0.75.