Questions: An insurance company collects data on seat-belt use among drivers in a country. Of 1400 drivers 20-29 years old, 21% said that they buckle up, whereas 309 of 1200 drivers 45-64 years old said that they did. At the 1% significance level, do the data suggest that there is a difference in seat-belt use between drivers 20-29 years old and those 45-64?
Let population 1 be drivers of age 20-29 and let population 2 be drivers of age 45-64. Use the two-proportions z-test to conduct the required hypothesis test. What are the hypotheses for this test?
A. H0: p1>p2, Ha: p1=p2
B. H0: p1=p2, Ha: p1 ≠ p2
C. H0: p1=p2, Ha: p1>p2
D. H0: p1<p2, Ha: p1=p2
E. H0: p1 ≠ p2, Ha: p1=p2
F. H0: p1=p2, Ha: p1<p2
Transcript text: An insurance company collects data on seat-belt use among drivers in a country. Of 1400 drivers 20-29 years old, $21 \%$ said that they buckle up, whereas 309 of 1200 drivers $45-64$ years old said that they did. At the $1 \%$ significance level, do the data suggest that there is a difference in seat-belt use between drivers 20-29 years old and those 45-64?
Let population 1 be drivers of age 20-29 and let population 2 be drivers of age 45-64. Use the two-proportions z-test to conduct the required hypothesis test. What are the hypotheses for this test?
A. $H_{0}: p_{1}>p_{2}, H_{a}: p_{1}=p_{2}$ B. $\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mathrm{p}_{1}=\mathrm{p}_{2}, \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: \mathrm{p}_{1} \neq \mathrm{p}_{2}$
C. $H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}, H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}$ D. $H_{0}: p_{1}
Solution
Solution Steps
To determine if there is a significant difference in seat-belt use between the two age groups, we will perform a two-proportions z-test. The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that the proportions of seat-belt use in both age groups are equal, while the alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) suggests that the proportions are not equal. We will calculate the z-statistic and compare it to the critical value at the 1% significance level to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Step 1: Define the Hypotheses
We define the null and alternative hypotheses for the two-proportions z-test as follows:
Null hypothesis: \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \)
Alternative hypothesis: \( H_a: p_1 \neq p_2 \)
Where:
\( p_1 \) is the proportion of drivers aged 20-29 who buckle up.
\( p_2 \) is the proportion of drivers aged 45-64 who buckle up.
Step 2: Calculate the Counts and Observations
From the data provided:
For drivers aged 20-29:
Number of successes (drivers who buckle up): \( 0.21 \times 1400 = 294 \)
For drivers aged 45-64:
Number of successes (drivers who buckle up): \( 309 \)
Thus, we have:
Count: \( [294, 309] \)
Total observations: \( [1400, 1200] \)
Step 3: Perform the Z-Test
Using the counts and observations, we calculate the z-statistic and p-value. The calculated values are:
Z-statistic: \( z \approx -0.5774 \)
P-value: \( p \approx 0.5630 \)
Step 4: Decision Rule
At the \( 1\% \) significance level, we compare the p-value to \( 0.01 \):
Since \( p \approx 0.5630 > 0.01 \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Final Answer
The data do not suggest a significant difference in seat-belt use between drivers aged 20-29 and those aged 45-64. Therefore, the answer is: