Questions: Examples of things the private investigator should not take responsibility for include:

To address the question, I'll focus on the first three items listed:

1. "Proprietary" information questioning:

   • This likely refers to the handling of sensitive or confidential information that is owned by a company or individual. When questioning proprietary information, it is important to ensure that the information is protected and not disclosed without proper authorization. The private investigator should be cautious and ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards when dealing with such information.

2. Adoption of the same of motions:

   • This phrase is somewhat unclear, but it might refer to the process of adopting motions in a formal setting, such as a meeting or legal proceeding. In this context, a private investigator should not take responsibility for the adoption of motions unless they are directly involved in the process and have the authority to do so. Their role is typically more about gathering information and evidence rather than participating in procedural decisions.

3. Security "not" to insider invitation:

   • This could imply a situation where security measures are in place to prevent unauthorized access or insider threats. A private investigator should not take responsibility for security protocols unless they are specifically hired to assess or implement security measures. Their role might involve investigating potential breaches or vulnerabilities, but the responsibility for security typically lies with the organization's security team.

In summary, the private investigator should focus on their primary role of gathering and analyzing information while ensuring they do not overstep their responsibilities, particularly in areas involving proprietary information, procedural decisions, or security measures.