Questions: Test the claim that the proportion of people who own cats is significantly different than 10% at the 0.05 significance level.
The null and alternative hypothesis would be:
H0: p=0.1
H1: p ≠ 0.1
The test is:
two-tailed
Based on a sample of 800 people, 16% owned cats The test statistic is: (to 2 decimals)
The p-value is: (to 2 decimals)
Based on this we:
Reject the null hypothesis
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
Transcript text: Test the claim that the proportion of people who own cats is significantly different than $10 \%$ at the 0.05 significance level.
The null and alternative hypothesis would be:
\[
\begin{array}{l}
H_{0}: p=0.1 \\
H_{1}: p \neq 0.1
\end{array}
\]
The test is:
two-tailed
Based on a sample of 800 people, $16 \%$ owned cats
The test statistic is: $\square$ (to 2 decimals)
The $p$-value is: $\square$ (to 2 decimals)
Based on this we:
Reject the null hypothesis
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
Solution
Solution Steps
Step 1: State the Hypotheses
We are testing the claim that the proportion of people who own cats is significantly different from \(10\%\). The hypotheses are defined as follows:
The P-value associated with the test statistic \(Z = 5.66\) is calculated to be:
\[
\text{P-value} = 0.0
\]
Step 4: Decision Rule
We compare the P-value to the significance level \(\alpha = 0.05\):
If \(\text{P-value} < \alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis.
If \(\text{P-value} \geq \alpha\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Since \(0.0 < 0.05\), we reject the null hypothesis.
Final Answer
Based on the results, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the proportion of people who own cats is significantly different from \(10\%\).