The answer is: Determine how well the premises support the conclusion.
Inductive arguments do not deal with absolute truth or falsity. Instead, they are concerned with the probability of the conclusion being true based on the premises. Therefore, this option is not applicable to assessing the strength of an inductive argument.
Validity is a term used in deductive reasoning, where an argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. Inductive arguments, on the other hand, are not assessed in terms of validity but rather in terms of strength or weakness.
This statement is incorrect. Inductive arguments can indeed be assessed for their strength. The strength of an inductive argument is determined by how well the premises support the conclusion, making it more or less probable.
This is the correct way to assess the strength of an inductive argument. The strength of an inductive argument is based on the degree to which the premises, if true, make the conclusion likely to be true. A strong inductive argument has premises that provide significant support for the conclusion, while a weak one does not.