The answer is Certain genetic conditions.
High intelligence scores are not typically associated with an increased risk of self-injury in individuals with autism. Intelligence levels can vary widely among individuals with autism, and self-injury is more closely linked to other factors.
Low degrees of repetitive behavior are not generally considered a risk factor for self-injury. In fact, repetitive behaviors are a common characteristic of autism and are not directly linked to self-injury risk.
Certain genetic conditions can place individuals with autism at a greater risk of self-injury. For example, genetic syndromes such as Fragile X syndrome or Rett syndrome, which can co-occur with autism, are associated with higher rates of self-injurious behavior.
Adequate communication skills are generally protective against self-injury. Individuals with better communication skills can often express their needs and frustrations more effectively, reducing the likelihood of self-injurious behavior.
True
Least-restrictive procedures are usually the first choice of intervention because they prioritize the individual's autonomy and dignity while aiming to achieve the desired outcomes. These procedures are designed to be minimally intrusive and are often preferred in therapeutic and educational settings to ensure that interventions are ethical and respectful of the individual's rights.
The answer is Data-based, ethical, and closely monitored.
Intervention plans should be data-based, ethical, and closely monitored to ensure their effectiveness and appropriateness. Data-based interventions rely on empirical evidence to guide decision-making, ensuring that the strategies used are supported by research. Ethical considerations are crucial to protect the rights and well-being of the individual receiving the intervention. Close monitoring allows for ongoing assessment and adjustment of the intervention to meet the individual's needs effectively.