Questions: Which describes a difference between the group known as "War Hawks" and Federalists? "War Hawks" favored the War of 1812 while the Federalists were against it. Federalists wanted to conquer and annex Canada while the "War Hawks" wanted to focus on defeating Great Britain on American soil. "War Hawks" supported DeWitt Clinton while Federalists supported James Madison.

The answer is: "War Hawks" favored the War of 1812 while the Federalists were against it.

This statement is accurate. The "War Hawks" were a group of young and aggressive members of Congress, primarily from the South and the West, who were in favor of going to war with Great Britain in 1812. They believed that war was necessary to defend American honor, secure maritime rights, and potentially expand U.S. territory. In contrast, the Federalists, who were largely based in the Northeast, opposed the War of 1812. They were concerned about the economic impact of the war on trade and were generally more inclined towards maintaining peaceful relations with Great Britain.

This statement is incorrect. It was actually the "War Hawks" who were interested in the idea of conquering and annexing Canada as part of their war aims. They saw it as a way to expand U.S. territory and weaken British influence in North America. The Federalists, on the other hand, were not interested in territorial expansion through war and were more focused on maintaining economic stability and trade relations.

This statement is misleading. DeWitt Clinton was a Democratic-Republican who ran against James Madison in the presidential election of 1812. The "War Hawks" were generally aligned with Madison, who was also a Democratic-Republican and supported the war. The Federalists, who opposed the war, were more likely to support Clinton as an alternative to Madison, although Clinton's candidacy was not strictly a Federalist endeavor.