Questions: Select the statement that is the contrapositive of the following statement:
If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it is an angle bisector.
Answer
If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray is an angle bisector, then it cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it
Submit Answer
isn't an angle bisector.
If a ray doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it isn't an angle bisector.
Transcript text: Select the statement that is the contrapositive of the following statement:
If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it is an angle bisector.
Answer
If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray is an angle bisector, then it cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it
Submit Answer
isn't an angle bisector.
If a ray doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it isn't an angle bisector.
Solution
Solution Steps
To find the contrapositive of a given statement, we need to negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion and then switch their places. The original statement is: "If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it is an angle bisector."
Identify the hypothesis and conclusion:
Hypothesis: A ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Conclusion: It is an angle bisector.
Negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion:
Negated Hypothesis: A ray doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Negated Conclusion: It isn't an angle bisector.
Switch the negated hypothesis and conclusion:
Contrapositive: If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Step 1: Identify the Hypothesis and Conclusion
The original statement is: "If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it is an angle bisector."
Hypothesis: A ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Conclusion: It is an angle bisector.
Step 2: Negate Both the Hypothesis and Conclusion
Negate the hypothesis and the conclusion:
Negated Hypothesis: A ray doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Negated Conclusion: It isn't an angle bisector.
Step 3: Switch the Negated Hypothesis and Conclusion
Switch the places of the negated hypothesis and conclusion to form the contrapositive:
Contrapositive: If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
Step 4: Match the Contrapositive with Given Statements
Compare the contrapositive statement with the given options:
If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray is an angle bisector, then it cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.
If a ray cuts an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it isn't an angle bisector.
If a ray doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles, then it isn't an angle bisector.
The contrapositive statement matches the first option.
Final Answer
\(\boxed{\text{If a ray isn't an angle bisector, then it doesn't cut an angle into two smaller, congruent angles.}}\)