Questions: Proportional representation systems encourage the formation of smaller parties by enabling parties to advertise on television. share in patronage appointments, which serve as an incentive to lure campaign workers. win legislative seats by lottery for parties that have no chance of winning majority support. win legislative seats even though they do not receive a majority of votes in elections. receive campaign funds from government in proportion to their support in opinion polls.

The answer is: win legislative seats even though they do not receive a majority of votes in elections.

Explanation for each option:

1. Advertise on television: Proportional representation systems do not inherently provide television advertising opportunities. This is more related to campaign finance laws and media regulations.

2. Share in patronage appointments: While patronage can be a feature of political systems, it is not a direct result of proportional representation. Patronage is more about political appointments and rewards, not the electoral system itself.

3. Win legislative seats by lottery: Proportional representation does not involve winning seats by lottery. It allocates seats based on the proportion of votes received.

4. Win legislative seats even though they do not receive a majority of votes in elections: This is correct. Proportional representation allows parties to gain seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive, even if they do not achieve a majority.

5. Receive campaign funds from government in proportion to their support in opinion polls: This is not a feature of proportional representation. Campaign funding is typically determined by specific laws and regulations, not directly by the electoral system.