Questions: Which of the nation's first three presidents developed the best approach to dealing with other countries? Would that same approach work today? Recently, you completed an assignment comparing the foreign policies of George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson. Decide which of these presidents' strategies represents the most wise and sensible approach to dealing with other nations, and explain why you think so. Then, describe a contemporary example of a foreign policy issue (something from the last 10-12 years), and explain how that situation might (or might not) benefit from an early president's foreign policy approach.

To determine which of the first three U.S. presidents—George Washington, John Adams, or Thomas Jefferson—developed the best approach to dealing with other countries, we must examine their foreign policies and the context in which they operated.

Washington's foreign policy was characterized by neutrality and non-entanglement. His Farewell Address in 1796 famously advised the nation to avoid permanent alliances with foreign countries, emphasizing the importance of focusing on domestic growth and stability. This approach was pragmatic given the young nation's limited military and economic power.

Adams faced significant foreign policy challenges, particularly with France. His administration is noted for the Quasi-War with France, an undeclared naval conflict. Adams prioritized diplomacy, sending envoys to negotiate peace, which eventually led to the Convention of 1800, ending hostilities. His approach was marked by a balance between defense readiness and diplomatic negotiation.

Jefferson's foreign policy included the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of the United States, and the Embargo Act of 1807, which aimed to avoid war by halting trade with warring European nations. While the purchase was a significant achievement, the embargo had mixed results, harming the U.S. economy more than it pressured Britain or France.

Considering the context and outcomes, George Washington's policy of neutrality and non-entanglement appears to be the most wise and sensible for the time. It allowed the United States to focus on internal development and avoid costly conflicts that could have jeopardized its nascent stability.

A contemporary foreign policy issue is the U.S. relationship with China, particularly regarding trade and military tensions in the South China Sea. Washington's approach of cautious engagement and avoiding entangling alliances could be beneficial today. By focusing on diplomatic solutions and economic partnerships while maintaining a strong defense posture, the U.S. could manage its relationship with China without escalating into conflict.

In conclusion, while the global landscape has changed significantly since the 18th century, the principles of cautious engagement and prioritizing national interests remain relevant. Washington's approach, emphasizing neutrality and strategic alliances, could offer valuable lessons for contemporary foreign policy challenges.